News

City finish in 3rd place 

Topic: City charged by FA  (Read 894 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Moon

City charged by FA
« on: March 20, 2017, 07:17:57 PM »
City have been charged for failing to control the players have they complained about the Liverpool pen.

Can understand them being a bit pissed off when they get a much softer pen than the 2 we had turned down

Offline Chippy_Tea

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2017, 08:11:38 PM »
I had a feeling it wouldn't end on the pitch the commentator even mentioned the new rule as it was happening.

Offline Cardiff Blue

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2017, 08:43:31 PM »
So you can't ask the ref why he made a certain decision any more?

Offline Moon

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2017, 07:48:19 AM »
So you can't ask the ref why he made a certain decision any more?
Apart from why are you a useless Arse hole

Offline Chippy_Tea

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2017, 10:01:55 AM »
I may be wrong but doesn't the new rule say only the captain can approach the ref.

Offline Chippy_Tea

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2017, 10:14:00 AM »
The International Football Association Board (IFAB) have made nearly 100 alterations to the game which will come into force in the Premier League for the first time.

It follows the FA Cup allowing an extra substitution in the three final rounds if they go to extra-time on the recommendation of IFAB.

The biggest changes will be concerning players surrounding and abusing the referee.

Anyone running to contest a decision, arguing face-to-face with officials and players using 'visibly disrespectful' actions will be booked.

Players will also be sent off for confronting officials and using insulting/offensive language or gestures.

Offline blueinusa

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2017, 08:18:38 PM »
Honestly from what I saw, unless someone said something really nasty, Michael Oliver needs to grow a pair and admit he fucked up.  He won't though and the FA will never hold him or any other referees account table.

Offline Moon

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2017, 08:28:49 PM »
It's annoying that refs who are well paid can make mistake after mistake but never have to explain them selves in public

Offline Chippy_Tea

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2017, 08:38:25 PM »
Quote
Honestly from what I saw, unless someone said something really nasty, Michael Oliver needs to grow a pair and admit he fucked up.  He won't though and the FA will never hold him or any other referees account table.


Offline SALFORD BLUE

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2017, 05:55:35 PM »
So we've been fined 35k yet nited were only fined 20k for an identical offence...that seems fair doesn't it?

Offline ob

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2017, 08:36:23 PM »
So biased it's unreal

Offline cyberblue

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #11 on: March 27, 2017, 10:46:26 PM »
Why dont the refs ever get charged

Offline Moon

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2017, 09:13:19 AM »
Why dont the refs ever get charged
Or even made to explain their decisions

Video evidence is used to punish elbows etc after games it should be used to play back to the ref to say why they did or didn't give things

Offline SALFORD BLUE

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #13 on: April 07, 2017, 07:00:35 PM »
Shocked vinny hasn't got a ban for blocking costa's studs with his thigh

Offline Moon

Re: City charged by FA
« Reply #14 on: April 07, 2017, 08:39:06 PM »
Shocked vinny hasn't got a ban for blocking costa's studs with his thigh

Amazing  that  Dean said he  saw  that  and  said he dealt with it so no action can be taken

The ref v West Ham didn't see  Aguero  despite looking right at him so he could be banned ( rightly )